www.genethique.org

Bioethic information and analysis newsletter

Previous letter Previous Letter

Following Letter

Following Letter

N°95 - November 2007

 

Research on embryo: French actuality

Within this period of the year, you are a number to ask questions about the ethical scope of certain scientific choice of the AFM. This is a short reminder of lasts facts.

September 2007: inauguration of the Institute of human embryonic stem cells, I-STEM
- The Téléthon allowed financing the creation of the first high scale French centre of test for research on human embryo: the institute I-STEM (Institute for Stem cell Therapy and Exploration of Monogenic diseases). We remind that research on embryo means that we take cells from the embryo (we destroy them) to use them as research material. Welcome by the Genopole of Evry, it is managed by Marc Peschanski who explains the origin of the I-STEM research project1: "this project came to my mind in 2002. Then I proved that we could improve the status of Huntington patients by grafting them foetal neurones". To face the lack of available foetal cells, he thought about the embryonic stem cells which can be cultured and differentiated in vitro. His purpose: to study embryonic stem cells. Then he particularly relies on the French Association against Myopathy (AFM), the Inserm and the university of Evry-Val d'Essonne. "I-STEM was created in 2005 with 7 million euros for two years"1 which make it "the biggest centre working on human embryonic stem cells"1. Marc Peschanski underlines the participation of the AFM in this project: "We had an AFM support of 3.4 million euros over 2 years, which covered half of our expenses"2. According to Les Echos, "the board of directors of the AFM commits itself for the next years, subject to the annual success of the Téléthon, to double the amount of public financing obtained by the project"2 "within the framework of its development 2007-2010, I-STEM develops taking possession of 1,600m2 of laboratories refurbished and equipped by the AFM"3.
- I-STEM was inaugurated in September 2007, in the presence of Valérie Pécresse, Minister in charge of Higher Education and Research.
- The bioethics law of 2004 authorises the researches on “supernumerary embryos, without parental project”. But waiting for the application decree, some researchers financed by the Téléthon were impatient. Thus they obtained from
February 2005, from ministers in charge of Health and Research, special authorisations to import embryonic cells in order to be able to start the research without delay within the I-STEM4. Another authorisation was signed in September 20055.
- In
June 2006, the first effective authorisations for research on human embryo were signed in France. Thus the first team which will attempt in France to create cell lines from human embryos will be co-directed by Mr Peschanski and S. Viville6.
- among the teams which work within the I-STEM, some are interested in stem cell lines developed
from ill embryos rejected after a preimplantation diagnosis (PGD). Another team works on the production of a cell line mutated from a healthy embryonic stem cell line.
- On 8 October 2007,
Inserm announced it has created a first line of human embryonic stem cells in France. It was obtained after destruction of an embryo coming from in vitro fertilization and carrier of chromosomal anomalies detected during preimplantation diagnosis (trisomy 1 and antimongolism). The works have been carried out by the team of the University of Paris-Sud XI, specialist of embryonic stem cell culture and by the team of Antoine Béclère de Clamart hospital which works on the embryo7. 38 couples have been solicited to give their embryos pour. Three couples refused, two for religion reasons; they are Muslim.
Researches would succeeded in differentiate some of these cells into nervous cells.
Theses will be put at Pr Marc Peschanski’s disposal from the Genopole of Evry.7

Announcing the first international conference on human embryonic stem cells from 1st January to 2nd February at the Genopole of Evry
The objectives of this event are to create, for the first time in France, an international display of research on human embryonic stem cells, to gather and federate the researchers around this research. In one word: to dynamize the research on the embryo. This event has a vocation to become "The" international conference of research on embryo. Industrials, public organisations, investors, the press, etc are invited to participate under collaboration. Marc Peschanski will intervene. This colloquium is announced on the I-STEM website8.


1- Libération, 16/10/007
2- Les Echos, 25 /09/07
3- www.afm-france.org, 24 /10/07
4- Le Monde, 18/02/05 ; Le Figaro, 19/02/05 ; Actualités de l'Institut de Myologie, 04/03/05 (in Orphanews)
5- Le Quotidien du Médecin, 02 /09/05
6- Gènéthique, octobre 2006 ; Le Monde, 22/06/06 ; Le Quotidien du Médecin, 23/06/06
7- Le Figaro, 24/10/07
8- Collaboration file on www.istem.fr

 

From the genetic "all" to the business of test dealers


After the adoption of the law relative to immigration which authorises the recourse to DNA tests for the candidates wanting to join their family, the mass media dedicated a number of files to the temptation of the genetic “all” and to the financial stakes of these tests. If the amendment Mariani opens a way which worries a large number of observers, we have to admit that concerning health, a red line has already been crossed.

DNA Tests and safety
According to the weekly newspaper La Vie, the national computerised file of genetic footprint (Fnaeg), created in 1998 for only sexual offenders, counts today with 500,000 nominative sheets (vs 4 million in Great Britain). It could contain 3 million in 2010. Since 2003, 137 infractions may give rise to a genetic test. These genetic have widely proved their efficacy in criminal investigations, to identify the offender and to find innocent false suspects. The Fnaeg could have resolved this way more than de 600 cases.

DNA Tests and health: the red line
In France, the bioethics law of 2004 authorises the recourse to genetic tests within a medical or scientific framework. Theses tests can only be prescribed by a physician and require a previous ‘informed consent’ from the patient. The results of these tests have to be given and explained by the physician who prescribed them. The legislation also foresees that the Agency of Biomedicine authorises physicians and pharmacists to perform these tests, but the decree is not yet signed. For Carine Camby, director of the Agency of Biomedicine, these tests give rise to two major issues: their understanding by users because they are difficult to interpret; and their growing availability via Internet. Finally, another issue exists, the results of the tests can interest the members of the family concerned...

How to not be worried about a possible extension of using these tests for insurance or job? Even if, fort he moment, the Civil Code and the Public Health Code prohibit it. According to Carlos de Sola, head of health and bioethical department in the European Council, the threat of using genetics is important for the insurances: "if a consensus exists around the job, a fundamental right, it is not necessarily the same for private insurances". In Switzerland, for example, genetic tests can be required to subscribe a life insurance over 400,000 Swiss francs (250,000 €).

If genetics allowed real therapeutic progresses, the genetic tests also allowed the selection of a child according to his/her genetic criteria. Today, in France, 98 % of child with Down’s Syndrome detected in utero do not simply have the right to live. From now, is the red line crossed? For the philosopher Olivier Abel, professor at the University of Protestant Theology of Paris and member of the national consultative ethics committee, "to believe that we are going to resolve all with genetics is naive". Thus, "to know the irreversible handicap which will make part of a children life, or to know which disease he/she swill develop and when, does not always give the means to correct the anomaly observed... apart from the threatening power of selection, before the birth, the existences which can live and the one which cannot, according to their handicap, the "losers" of this selection".
"To avoid any form of exclusion, we could invoke the confidentiality (...). The moral foundation here could be to respond "I do not want to know it"."

Tests and business
In 2006, the global market of in vitro diagnosis represented more than 30 billion euros. The daily newspaper Le Monde dedicated an interesting file to this business.
Moreover the actors of the healthcare system, the major targets of this market are individuals, shops, schools or companies. More and more patients particularly buy over the counter tests. The in vitro diagnosis at the same time relies on traditional techniques of analyses (haematology, immunology, biochemistry, microbiology...) and on two more recent techniques: glucose tests and molecular diagnosis. The molecular tests (or genetic) study and measure the variations and mutations of human genetic material. They represent 20% of global market and increase every year from 12 to 15%. These tests are used in the advanced medicine, in the fight against bioterrorism, in the food or in the public health, and more and more on the development of targeted new drugs which open the way to customised medicine. These genetic tests should allow elaborating custom-made drugs.
The newspaper cites the example of a genetic diagnosis company, Labgenetics, which proposes, via Internet, two kinds of genetic diagnosis, for individuals or professionals. The first tests have a medical purpose: they allow detecting a predisposition to such or such disease (Alzheimer, Parkinson...). The second one, which represents the 3/4 of individual demands, concerns the paternity. Regarding the professionals which are interested in such tests, they are in general private detectives. Labgenetics states it does not deal with insurance companies. In 2007, the activity of Labgenetics increased by 40% compared to 2006 and its turnover is estimated at 400,000 €.
In 2005, the first ten in vitro diagnosis producers made 80% of global turnover. Some giants of the pharmaceutical industry - including Roche, Siemens, General Electric Healthcare - have the market in their hands. Pharmaceutical laboratories and specialist of medical imaging fight with billions around a new concept: the customised medicine.
J.-J. Cassiman, professor of human genetics at the Catholic University of Louvain, estimates the potential turnover of genetic test market in Europe between 900,000 € and 28 million € per million of inhabitants, "according to the extent of the prescriptions of healthcare professionals"...


Source :
La Vie, 01/11/07
Le Monde, 23/10/07
Le Quotidien du Médecin, 24/10/07

 

  is a monthly newsletter, distributed free of charge, and published by the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation. Director of the Publication : Jean-Marie Le Méné - Editor in chief : Aude Dugast
37 rue des Volontaires - 75725 Paris Cedex 15 - France - Tel : +33 (0)1.44.49.73.39 - ISSN 1638-198 X
contact@genethique.org

 

Subscribe today to weekly Press Review or monthly Newsletter, it's free!

 

Traduction by A.R-TRADUCTION