www.genethique.org

Bioethic information and analysis newsletter

Previous letter Previous Letter

Following Letter

Following Letter

N°91 - July 2007

 

Promises of umbilical cord blood and blockages in France

Source of pluripotent cells
Cord blood, present in the umbilical cord which connects the baby to the placenta, can be sampled after birth, without constraints either for the baby or for the mother. More than hundred million babies are born every year in the world, which represents a number of available stem cells, covering a large variety of tissue types. Cord blood is generally incinerated after birth whereas it represents an ethical source of pluripotent stem cells for most of global population. Its storage, by freezing, is easy and its availability higher than that of stem cells from bone marrow. Contrary to the embryonic stem cells which require the destruction of the embryo, collecting placenta blood is a totally ethical act and accessible to everybody which opens large therapeutic perspectives.


Therapeutic perspectives
Cord blood contains a group of very rare and immature stem cells which have the exceptional capacity to form several tissue types. Professor Colin McGuckin, from the University of Newcastle was the first in the world to show (in 2005) the existence of pluripotent cells in the cord blood, i.e. which have the characteristic to transform into different tissues. This team achieves to create liver, but also nerve tissue, pancreas tissue, blood vessels, from these cells sampled from cord blood. Also, it used these cells to regenerate human corneal tissue.

On 24th October 2006, Pr. McGuckin published others surprising results: for the first time the creation of a mini-liver in 3 dimensions and a few weeks ago, in June 2007, his team published in Cell Proliferation a paper showing that it succeeded in creating insulin-producing human tissues.

Umbilical cord blood grafts are used for more than twenty years for blood diseases like leukaemia or sickle-cell anaemia. But they are not only used for diseases related to blood or immune system (bubble child): they are also used for pathologies affecting bone marrow, nervous system or metabolism, like type I diabetes or human cornea. Blood cord is thus used to treat more than 85 diseases, recently including Krabbe’s disease, a genetic disease affecting the development of the nervous system. Regarding the reconstitution of liver cells, the applications are numerous, particularly for pharmaceutical companies which want to test the consequences of their drugs on the liver, without resorting to laboratory animals.

Yet, some researchers carry on denying the therapeutic efficacy of cord blood cells, like Marc Peschanski, director of Inserm laboratory of Evry, co-financed by the Association française contre les myopathies (AFM) (French Myopathy Association), works on embryonic cells and states that “cord blood cells did not prove their efficacy in the field of regenerative medicine1.


Shortage, delay and prejudice
In accordance with the opinion from the National Consultative Ethics Committee on 12th December 2002, French authorities reject the private banks in the name of the principles of solidarity, gratuitousness and anonymity of the donation but, today France counts only with 2 public banks of cord blood, in Bordeaux and Besançon.
Between 1994 and 2005, hospitals have imported 63% of the grafts whereas these are ten times more expensive (20,000 euros) than if they have been preserved in France. In this context of shortage of donations, how to justify that more than 2,000 umbilical cords are destroyed every day? France only have 5,800 available units of placental blood, (which ranks it at the 16th position in the world, beyond Check Republic), ten more would be necessary to meet the demand. The Agency of biomedicine has just decided to allocate a budget of €575,000 to have, by 3 years, a stock of 10,000 placental units. This seems derisory compared to other countries: thus, Sweden unfroze €2 million to exceed 250,000 units (for 9 millions of inhabitants).

According to some jurists, one day this delay could be assimilated to a prejudice by the patients who then could attack the doctors guilty of not having permitted them to benefit from this technique.

Cord blood banks are an essential link for the advances of the regenerative medicine. As concluded the journalist from La Vie, who has just written a fascinating paper about this issue1, "
the generalisation of collecting cord blood can only come from a political will". In USA, for instance, the Congress voted 265 million dollars to develop a network of public banks throughout the country… In other country, like England, interesting models of banks develop, like the Virgin Health Bank, semi private-public (see Gènéthique No 90, June 2007).
To be developed, this research requires a dialogue between the governments, the medical profession, the industrials and the public.


1. L. Grzybowski, Sang de cordon : l’étrange omerta, La Vie, 5 juillet 2007

 

Mandatory contraception on pain of divorce

Child conceived: cause of divorce
The Court of Appeal of Nîmes1 has just pronounced a divorce for reciprocal fault, retaining a fault of the wife to have conceived a child without her husband’s knowledge, father of the child: “Based on the current status of manners and existing means of contraception in the French contemporaneous society, the conception of a child by a married couple must be of mutual choice and common project… The conception of a child without her husband’s knowledge in very specific circumstances is for the wife a neglect of loyalty duty between the spouses, the husband moreover being
reduced to the simple role of genitor”, act constituting “a serious violation of duties and obligations of marriage and which makes common life intolerable”. The wife could not ignore that her husband did not want a baby anymore as the couple had already lost two children just after their birth.

Child: prejudice for the father?
The Court of Appeal of Nîmes gives us the image of a child, conceived during the marriage, who should not have existed to the prejudice of third, here his father. “When’s the act of a child against her/his mother (or her legal liability insurer) for having given birth thus causing, by her/his fault, her divorce with her/his father and the prejudice of a destroyed life? The perspective of a new kind of Perruche jurisprudence, applied to parental conflicts, is it still a hypothesis?2

Right of the husband on his wife’s body?
The Court judged that it constitutes a fault to be pregnant without her husband consent, father of the child. The right of the husband on his wife’s body thus would extend to her obligation to have contraception, even without being indicated that he asked her!

Abortion without father agreement
On the other hand, in France the father has no legal mean to oppose to the mother’s abortive will who can decide alone to eliminate their child. If he is married, he could maybe obtain a divorce for the fault of the wife who had, against his opinion, interrupted her pregnancy, but no jurisdiction has already pronounced about this issue…


1. CA Nîmes, 21 mars 2007, 2è ch.civ.
2. Bull. Dictionnaire permanent bioéthique et biotechnologies, juillet 2007

 

Master in bioethics “Jérôme Lejeune”: a chance for life

Jérôme Lejeune Foundation opens, in September 2007, a master in bioethics, in collaboration with the Institute of Political Studies Léon Harmel, in order to “train consciousness and prepare professionals” faced with the challenges of the modern medicine, with a personalise perspective.

At whom?
This course aims at health professionals, students in biology, law, medicine, philosophy, various actors of political and social life and at all people who wish to have a course to take up the challenges of new bioethics stakes.

Why?
Because one day or another, these people will be faced with situations accepting liability, this master gives them keys to:
- understand the philosophical and anthropological stakes on health issues
- acquire thinking bases concerning medical ethics
- serve life and the suffering human being

Program:                                                                                     Teachers:

Philosophy                                                                                   Pr Bénédicte Mathonat
Law                                                                                             Pr François Vallançon, Me Jean Paillot
Biology and Physiology                                                                 Dr Claire Diradourian
Anthropology                                                                                Pr Gérard-François Dumont, Dr Damien Le Guay
Epistemology (bioethics models)                                                    Jean-Marie Le Méné, Pierre-Olivier Arduin
Religions                                                                                      Isabelle Levy, Father de Malherbe, Father Biju-Duval

Practical Information
The master will take place in Paris, with 300 hours over two years, one day and a half per month. Decentralised sites are planned for groups of at least five students.

Information and enrolment: www.iplh.fr - Contact: contact@iplh.fr – Phone: 06 25 37 62 83

 

  is a monthly newsletter, distributed free of charge, and published by the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation. Director of the Publication : Jean-Marie Le Méné - Editor in chief : Aude Dugast
37 rue des Volontaires - 75725 Paris Cedex 15 - France - Tel : +33 (0)1.44.49.73.39 - ISSN 1638-198 X
contact@genethique.org

 

Subscribe today to weekly Press Review or monthly Newsletter, it's free!

 

Traduction by A.R-TRADUCTION