www.genethique.org

Bioethic information and analysis newsletter

Previous letter Previous Letter

Following Letter

Following Letter

N°65 - May 2005

The Newsletter index
Is adipose tissue a reservoir of stem cells?
Establishment of the Biomedicine agency (Agence de biomédecine)
Research on prenatal ultrasound after the Perruche judgement
 

Is adipose tissue a reservoir of stem cells?

By injecting human adipose tissue stem cells, some research teams from CNRS (French National Scientific Research Centre) and INSERM (French National Institute for Health and Medical Research) managed to regenerate human muscle cells, without any rejection reaction. This work, promising in mice, is hopeful for the treatment of muscular diseases, particularly Duchenne muscular dystrophy1.

Blood and cardiac cells
Based on the injection of immature cells likely to acquire, in an enabling environment, the morphology and the function of deficient cells in an injured tissue, the cell therapy particularly concerns adipose tissues. Adipose tissues represent about 10% of the mass of a healthy individual and up to 50% in an obese individual; collecting adipose tissue is not an ethical problem as the used cells result from surgery waste. In 2004, the CNRS-Inserm team supervised by Louis Casteilla had showed it was possible to obtain in vitro cardiac cells from fat cells. At the same time, the Inserm teams supervised by Bernard Levy, in collaboration with Louis Casteilla's team and Anne Bouloumié's one, demonstrated that in mice, these cells could turn into cells that constitute blood vessels.

Reservoir of pluripotent cells
The teams of Christian Dani, researcher for the Inserm and director of the Laboratory “Stem cells and differentiation”, and Gérard Ailhaud, UMR 6543 CNRS (Institute of signalling), managed to obtain, from adipose tissue collected on young donors, pluripotent stem cells called hMADS (Human Multipotent Adipose Derived Stem Cell). These cells are more immature, thus have a greater potential, than the cells obtained before. This work 1 demonstrates that in vitro, depending on its environment, a same hMADS stem cell is able to generate a muscle, bone, fat or cartilage cell. Once isolated and cultured, these cells showed a strong proliferation capacity, normal chromosomes, no oncogenic character, and no rejection reaction. The researchers noted that the cells only poorly expressed the histocompatibility antigens responsible for graft rejection.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy
In order to study repair potentials of the stem cells, the team studied “mdx” mice, which are models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The mice are dystrophin-deficient; dystrophin is a protein that is necessary to the integrity of muscle fibres, for without dystrophin muscle fibres cannot resist the strength of muscle contraction, and then degenerate.
In humans, this genetic muscular dystrophy, transmitted by the mother, affects 1 of 3,500 baby boys at birth in France. The dystrophy progressively leads to muscular atrophy of skeletal, respiratory and cardiac muscles. When transplanted in small quantity in dystrophic mice, and with no immunosuppressive treatment, the adipose tissue stem cells were not rejected and induced a strong, long-term human dystrophin expression. This work led to international patenting.

1 - Journal of Experimental Medicine, Transplantation of a multipotent cell population from human adipose tissue induces dystrophin expression in the immunocompetent mdx mouse, A.M Rodriguez, D. Pisani, C.A Dechesne, C. Turc-Carel, J.Y Kurzenne, B. Wdziekonski, A. Villageois, C. Bagnis, J.P Breittmayer, H. Groux, G. Ailhaud, C. Dani,  2 mai 2005.

.

To the top of the page

 

Establishment of the Biomedicine agency (Agence de biomédecine)

Created by the bioethics law, dating 6 August 2004, the Biomedicine agency has just been officially inaugurated with the publication of the decree, dating 4 May 2005, that establishes the functioning rules of the Agency 1.

Two fields of competency
The Biomedicine agency is competent in two very vast fields: firstly, the field of grafts, for the Agency replaces the French organisation for transplantations (Etablissement français des greffes) – in this field, the Agency has to control the list of patients that are waiting for a transplantation, as well as the register of refusal for donation, and establishes the rules of good practice; secondly, the field of reproduction, embryology and human genetics.

The Agency provides practitioner accreditations in these fields and authorises prenatal and pre-implantation diagnosis, as well as international movements of human gametes, embryos, embryonic and fetal cells and tissues for research purposes. In both fields, the Agency participates in establishing the rules of the activities named above, and establishes recommendations. It announced the forthcoming publication of the decrees about embryonic stem cells, saviour children and living donors.

Research on embryos: the end of the transition system
In order to come up to the impatience of some researchers, a transition system had been established after the bioethics law dating 6 August 2004: last February, the Ministers of Health and of Research had authorised the importation of embryonic stem cell lines (Gènéthique n°63). Today, the Biomedicine Agency is competent to authorise research on spare embryos resulting from in vitro fertilisation and not being anymore the object of parental projects. Today, the number of frozen embryos is estimated to nearly 120,000; 45% of these embryos are not anymore the object of a parental project, and thus could be “used”. This number can be compared to the 9,500 babies who were born resulting from an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) every year in France.

« Saviour children »
The Agency is also responsible for the authorisation for the pre-implantation diagnosis (PID), with the objective to give birth to a child that will be helpful to the treatment of a brother or a sister affected by a serious genetic disease. With the approval of the law, this kind of PID overcomes another step in the selection of in vitro human embryos; indeed, this kind of PID consists in selecting, among the healthy embryos, the one that will be helpful to the treatment of a child and in eliminating the others. In the United States, to treat 9 children waiting for bone marrow transplantation, 199 embryos were conceived in vitro, 28 of which, being compatible, were transferred in utero to give birth to 5 HLA-compatible babies.

Independence of the Agency
Within the Agency, the streaming committee is responsible for the quality of medical and scientific expert opinions, taking into account ethical issues. Alain Cordier has just been appointed chairman of the committee. The composition of the committee should counterbalance the powers of the scientists and allow the civil society to express their concerns. The committee is composed of 24 members. The decisions of the committee are taken by the majority of the present members.

The annual report of the Agency evaluates the progress of the research on embryos and stem cells, the implementation of the PID "saviour child” and the opportunity to maintain them. The report also assesses possible organ and gamete trafficking and suggests measures against it. The report is then transmitted to the ministers of Health and Research.

1 - Decree n° 2005-420 dating 4 May 2005 relative to the Biomedicine Agency (Agence de la biomédecine) and modifying the public health code (rules and regulations part), Official Journal dating 5 May.

To the top of the page

 

Research on prenatal ultrasound after the Perruche judgement1

Danielle Moyse and Nicole Diederich carried out a study on prenatal ultrasound after the Perruche judgement. The study was published in April 2005.

The Perruche judgement
The judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal, dating 17 November 2000, declared that Nicolas Perruche should receive compensation, for he was born disabled because his mother had contracted rubella during her pregnancy and because of the absence of diagnosis, Mrs Perruche “could not have an abortion”.

This decision, as well as two other judgements of the Supreme Court of Appeal, dating 13 July and 28 November 2001, seemed to attribute to the involved doctor and laboratories the responsibility of the disability and the birth of the child. This judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal admitted it was better not to come into existence than coming into existence with a disability. The Parliament suspended the Perruche jurisprudence thanks to a section in the law dating 4 March 2002, concerning patient rights: children cannot avail themselves of a prejudice due to their birth and the compensation for the parents is limited. 

Towards prevention eugenics?
The initial function of prenatal screening is to prepare labour envisaging, for example, a surgical action at the end of delivery in case of abnormality. The Perruche judgement might have led to prevention eugenics, as the prenatal diagnosis could have become the tool for having the right to have a normal child. After this decision was taken, sonographers and gynaecologists-obstetricians threatened to cease their activity or to implement prevention eugenics by requesting for medical abortions whenever there was the less doubt about the condition of the foetus, in order to avoid any risk of subsequent legal action.

Practice evolution: investigation
According to an investigation carried out between October 2002 and October 2004 among obstetricians and sonographers, the Perruche judgement generated a great suspension of activity - about 50%. The chairman of the association of sonographers explained that “among radiologists that did less than 30% of obstetrical ultrasounds within their global activity, the activity suspension rate represented 50%”. He followed in these terms “Among exclusive sonographers, the same activity suspension rate was found”. The involved doctors explained that the disaffection was as well due to the fear of legal actions and the increasing insurance premiums, as to ethics concerns. According to practitioners, the obligation to give information becomes problematic and the obligation to "say everything" generate anxiety, which may induce requests for medical abortions that should not be necessary. The phenomenon is reinforced by the progression of the deadline for requested legal abortion, passing from 12 weeks to 14 weeks since the law dating 4 July 2001.

In danger?
The national technical committee for prenatal screening ultrasounds will shortly hand in a report on fetal ultrasound to the Minister of Health. The report sounds the alarm. The Perruche judgement forced many freelance practitioners to give up the practice of fetal ultrasound and public hospitals are not in position to compensate for the decreasing freelance ultrasound offer. Health care for the poorest people is then reduced, regardless of the main objective of ultrasounds: the diminution of perinatal and maternal mortality, and the possibility to treat children as soon as they are born.

1 - L'échographie prénatale après l'arrêt Perruche, Etudes, Danielle Moyse et Nicole Diederich, April 2005.
 

To the top of the page

 

  is a monthly newsletter, distributed free of charge, and published by the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation. Director of the Publication : Jean-Marie Le Méné - Editor in chief : Aude Dugast
31 rue Galande - 75005 Paris - France - Tel : +33 (0)1.55.42.55.14 - ISSN 1638-198 X
contact@genethique.org

 

Subscribe today to weekly Press Review or monthly Newsletter, it's free!

 

Traduction by A.R-TRADUCTION