www.genethique.org

Bioethic information and analysis newsletter

Previous Letter

Following Letter

N°38 - February 2003

Bioethics laws : Adopted on 1st reading by the French Assembly and Senate

On 30th January 2003, the French Senate modified on first reading, the proposed law on bioethics adopted at its first reading by the National Assembly in January 2002. We provide below a parallel presentation between the text adopted by the National Assembly in 2002 and that adopted by the Senate in 2003. The second reading at the National Assembly is expected before the summer of 2003. Embryonic research is at the heart of the debate : Should one allow research on supernumerary embryos, the creation of embryos for research, therapeutic or reproductive cloning ? 

 
Proposed law adopted on 1st reading by the National Assembly on 22nd January 2002 Proposed law adopted on 1st reading by the Senate on 30th January 2003
Authorisation for research on embryos
The text is intended to authorise research on supernumerary embryos which are currently deep frozen, (article L.2151-3) : 
"Authorisation is granted for research undertaken on human embryos and embryonic cells for medical reasons...". 

"Research may only be conducted on embryos conceived in-vitro in the context of medically assisted procreation, and which are not subject to a parental project.
It may only be undertaken after a three-month waiting period, and with the written prior consent of the couple having produced them...".

 

Authorisation for the creation of embryos for research in the context of MAP.
It is not only research on supernumerary embryos which has been authorised, but also the conception of embryos intended for research, as covered by article L.2151-2 : 
"The conception in-vitro of human embryos for research purposes is prohibited, without prejudice for the provisions of article L.2141-1". But article L.2141-1, which deals with the evaluation of new medically assisted procreation techniques (MAP) ends as follows : 
"On completion of the evaluation process, the embryos conceived as a result of this evaluation may not be preserved, nor transferred, nor incorporated in the context of a research project under the provisions of article L.2151-3". 

Thus, although the conception in-vitro of human embryos for research purposes is declared as prohibited, the creation of embryos is nevertheless authorised in order to evaluate new medically assisted procreation techniques.

 

Rejection of cloning
"Any practice intended to give birth to a child or to develop an embryo not directly generated by the gametes of a man and a woman, is prohibited". This therefore raises the question of the prohibition of reproductive cloning, or of so-called therapeutic cloning. 

 

The opening for cloning 
The proposed prohibition concerns "any intervention" aimed at the birth of a child or the development of an embryo, without specifying the nature of the latter. This therefore covers all acts which would make such a birth possible, or which would enable an embryo to develop, whether in vitro or in vivo
During the debates on 17th January, amendment 74 was proposed in order to prohibit even more explicitly the conception of embryos produced by that technique. But amendment 74 was withdrawn by the speaker of the time, before being picked up by an elected deputy, M. Mattéi, and finally rejected.

The text adopted is therefore that which prohibits only the "development" of an embryo resulting from cloning. Articles 21 and 22 also prohibit only the "development" of a human embryo resulting from cloning. In consequence, the law does not strictly prohibit the conception of an embryo, i.e. the development of the cloning technique, without subsequent development of the embryo.

Authorisation for research on embryos by dispensation
Article L2151-3 as amended by the Senate establishes the principle of prohibiting research on the human embryo, but introduces dispensations in a 3rd paragraph :
Paragraph 1 : "Research on the human embryo is prohibited"
Paragraph 3 : "By dispensation of paragraph 1, and for a period limited to 5 years, (...) research may be authorised on embryos and embryonic cells when it is liable to enable major therapeutic advance, and subject that it is not able to be conducted by any alternative method of comparable efficiency, in the current state of scientific knowledge. Research for which the protocols have been authorised within this period of 5 years and which could not be completed in the context of the said protocol may nevertheless be pursued in compliance with the conditions laid down in the present article".
This 3rd paragraph was adopted by 280 votes to 22.
This overall amendment 121bis rectified by the Government, was adopted by 195 votes to 108.

Prohibition of the creation of embryos for research in the context of MAP
The new article L2151-2 of the public health code, as modified by amendment 117 corrected, deletes the exception introduced by the National Assembly with respect to MAP :
"The in-vitro conception or constitution by cloning of human embryos for research purposes is prohibited".
"Human embryos cannot be conceived nor constituted by cloning, nor used for commercial or industrial purposes".

Thus the Senate prohibits in-vitro conception of embryos for research or commercial purposes, but note that it does not prohibit in-vitro conception of embryos for therapeutic reasons, whereas it takes pains to specify the prohibition with respect to cloning. (cf. paragraph on therapeutic cloning)

Rejection of reproductive and therapeutic cloning

Reproductive cloning : "crime against the human species"
Article 21 (amendment 127) of the proposed law is modified thus : "any action intended to give birth to a child genetically identical to a human person either past or living, is prohibited".
This prohibition is associated with a new criminal offence known as "crime against the human species" which is punishable by a 30 year prison sentence and a 7.500.000 € fine.

Therapeutic cloning is prohibited 
- "conception in-vitro or constitution by cloning of human embryos for commercial or industrial purposes, is punishable by a 7 year prison sentence and a 100 000 € fine" (amdt. 128).
- "conception in-vitro or constitution by cloning of human embryos for research purposes is punishable by a 7 year prison sentence and a 100 000 € fine" (amdt. 129).
- "constitution by cloning of human embryos for therapeutic reasons is punishable by a 7 year prison sentence and 100 000 € fine" (amdt. 130).

Note the difference in wording between these two amendments : the latter paragraph, concerning therapeutic purposes is aimed at punishing the constitution by cloning and not in-vitro conception of embryos, as is the case in the previous paragraphs. Is it therefore permissible to conceive embryos for so-called therapeutic purposes ?

The final result
This modified proposed law was adopted by the Senate on 30th January 2003 by 196 votes to 107 with 12 abstentions. 

 

The bioethics laws and the commitment of Catholics in politics

In a "note" on the commitment of Catholics in politics cardinal Ratzinger from the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, invites Catholics to reject the "moral relativism" which has become the main criterion for political choice and a threat to democracy. This note arrives in France at the time of the debates on the bioethics laws.

The mission
Cardinal Ratzinger reminds us that Catholics have a right and a duty to defend moral truths on social life, justice, freedom, respect for life. They must resist proposed laws which are intended to break the "intangibility of life". This is particularly aimed at the laws which authorise abortions, research against the integrity of the embryo, euthanasia . "Jean-Paul II has on numerous occasions repeated that those who are directly involved in legal circles have a solemn and specific obligation to oppose any law which is an attempt against human life. For them, as for any Catholic, it is impossible to take part in a campaign in their favour, and nobody can support it with their vote". What is legal is not necessarily moral.

A bad pretext
Faithful lay people, in particular those with political responsibilities, must not lead two parallel lives : a spiritual life and a secular life. The political commitment of Catholics must suffer "no compromise". 
These are "fundamental ethical requirements, which no Catholic can deny". However, it is not rare to hear that ethical pluralism is a condition for democracy. "the value of tolerance is invoked misleadingly" and a large proportion of citizens – Catholics included – are expected to give up their participation in the social and political life of their own country according to the conception and the common good which they believe humanly to be true and just".
However, these ethical requirements are rooted in human being and belong to the "natural moral law". This "conscious promotion of the common good of political society has nothing to do with confessionalism". 
Reminding us that the Church is not hostile to secularity, the cardinal specifies that this is only legitimate if it is meant as "autonomy in the civil and political sphere relative to the religious and ecclesiastic sphere", and not "relative to the moral sphere".

 

  is a monthly newsletter, distributed free of charge, and published by the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation. Director of the Publication and Editor in chief : Jean-Marie Le Méné 
Contact : Aude Dugast - 31 rue Galande - 75005 Paris - France - Tel : +33 (0)1.55.42.55.14 - ISSN 1638-198 X
contact@genethique.org